Case Study
United States · Health & Fitness · D2C

How Forty Forty Cut Its Cost Per Purchase by 66% and Tripled Revenue in 90 Days

An untrained algorithm, wasted spend, and a $31 cost per purchase. Ninety days of disciplined weekly optimization later: 543 purchases in a single week at $10.87 each.

66% Reduction in cost per purchase
3x Increase in weekly purchases and revenue
543 Purchases in best single week

Forty Forty had a strong product and a broken paid acquisition engine

Forty Forty is a faith-based health and fitness program targeting adults, particularly women over 40, who want a structured and values-aligned approach to wellness. The product had clear demand, a defined audience, and strong mission alignment. The paid acquisition strategy did not.

When ads.expert came on board in November 2025, the Google Ads account was running without a trained algorithm, spending budget inefficiently across campaigns, and delivering a cost per purchase of $31.85, a figure that made profitable scale impossible. Branded and non-branded search campaigns were cannibalising each other's traffic. The Performance Max campaign had no clear purpose and was not suppressed after its urgency window had closed. Audience insights existed in the data but had never been acted on.

The account was generating purchases every week, but an underoptimised campaign structure meant a large share of potential buyers were never reached, never converted, and never counted.

Three structural problems keeping CAC elevated and growth capped

Six levers, nine weeks, zero learning phase resets

The approach was disciplined and sequential. Every week had a clear performance review, a specific optimisation action, and a decision framework for when to hold spend versus when to scale. The result was nine consecutive weeks of improvement with no panic adjustments.

01

Target ROAS Configuration by Campaign Type

Set differentiated Target ROAS targets across campaign types to give the algorithm clear, achievable goals without over-constraining volume. Non-Branded Search was set at 250% ROAS to prioritise efficiency; Christian Fitness campaigns were set at 90 to 100% to allow volume at a slightly looser threshold where audience overlap justified it. This prevented a single blended ROAS target from optimising toward the wrong campaigns.

02

Weekly Negative Keyword Cadence

Implemented a weekly negative keyword addition cadence across all campaigns, systematically filtering irrelevant search terms before they could waste budget. Simultaneously ran regular search term audits to identify and block cross-campaign cannibalisation between Branded and Non-Branded Search, ensuring each campaign owned its intended query segment without competing against itself.

03

Budget Pacing During Learning Phase

Made a deliberate decision to cut spend during early optimisation weeks, reducing budget by approximately 54% to allow the bidding algorithm to re-optimise without burning through budget on low-quality conversions. Spend was only scaled back up once CAC had stabilised below the target threshold, preventing the common mistake of scaling before the algorithm was ready.

04

PMAX Lifecycle Management

The PMAX campaign was built for a specific urgency window and paused once that window closed, rather than left running and diluting budget efficiency. Keeping a campaign live past its useful purpose increases algorithm confusion and cost per lead. Pausing it at the right moment preserved budget quality for the always-on campaigns heading into January.

05

Audience Intelligence and ICP Activation

Identified women aged 45 to 64 as the highest-converting demographic segment in Non-Branded Search and activated this insight across bid adjustments, ad copy, and audience targeting. This allowed the algorithm to prioritise the highest-value traffic segment while messaging was refined to speak directly to this audience.

06

Structured Weekly Performance Reviews

Established a consistent weekly performance review covering spend, CAC, purchase volume, search term quality, and bidding behaviour, with a documented win, action, and next-step framework for each week. This prevented drift, ensured every change had a clear hypothesis, and created an accountability layer that meant no optimisation opportunity was missed.

Stack used

CAC reduced from $31.85 to $10.87. Purchases tripled.

Google Ads
66% Reduction in cost per purchase
3x Increase in weekly purchases and revenue
543 Purchases in best single week
9 Consecutive winning weeks, zero resets
$10.87 Final cost per purchase, down from $31.85

A 66% reduction in CAC across 9 weeks, achieved through bid strategy discipline, weekly negative keyword cadence, budget pacing, and demographic targeting, without a single learning phase reset.

More case studies

See what else we have built

Ready to start?

Paying too much per purchase? Let's bring that number down.

We help D2C brands build Google Ads systems that scale profitably, with weekly discipline, not one-time fixes.

Book a 30-min Growth Call